You are here

Deepfake Detection and Generation

Welcome to the 1st edition of the Deepfake Detection and Generation Task!

Motivation

Deepfakes are AI-generated media that portray real individuals and are often created to manipulate, mislead, or misinform the public. Despite significant efforts by researchers and practitioners to combat the spread of falsified media in recent years, many challenges remain, particularly in understanding how deepfakes are generated and what makes a deepfake easily detectable. While in the past the lack of quality in the generated data made it straight-forward to detect deepfakes, generative models are always evolving, resulting in very realistic deepfakes. One of the most critical issues in this field is the lack of generalization: detection models trained on existing datasets frequently fail when confronted with previously unseen deepfake techniques.

This task aims to investigate state-of-the-art deepfake detection methods and to analyze the factors that make certain deepfakes especially difficult to detect, with a particular emphasis on the generation process itself. To enable this study, the task will be conducted across two modalities: audio and images. This will allow for a more comprehensive evaluation of deepfake characteristics and detection robustness across different forms of media.

The goal of this task is to bring together researchers and practitioners working in the field of disinformation, foster the development of new methods, and gain deeper insights into how deepfakes are generated and detected.

Schedule

The subtasks for Audio and Images will run at the same time.

The two tasks (Generation and Detection) will be carried out sequentially and will not overlap.

  • 26.01.2026: Registration opens for all ImageCLEF tasks
  • 23.04.2026: Registration closes for all ImageCLEF tasks
  • 03.03.2026: Generation task starts. Development dataset released
  • 03.04.2026: Generation task ends. Deadline for submitting participant runs.
  • 07.04.2026: Detection task starts. Test dataset released
  • 07.05.2026: Detection task ends. Deadline for submitting participant runs
  • 28.05.2026: Submission of participant papers [CEUR-WS]
  • 30.06.2026: Notification of acceptance
  • 21.09.2026: CLEF 2026, Jena, Germany

Task Description

The task is composed of 2 subtasks, with each one being applied to two modalities: audio or images. The sub-tasks are strongly connected, with results from one subtask being used in the evaluation of the other. Therefore, the tasks will not run at the same time: the generation task will be held first, and afterwards, the detection task. Although participation in only one subtask or only one modality is allowed, we encourage participation in both sub-tasks, as they are deeply connected. The subtasks are:

Subtask 1: Deepfake Generation (audio and images)

In this subtask, participants will generate images or short audio clips depicting specific identities from a real-world dataset. The objective is to better understand the factors that make deepfakes difficult to detect. To this end, participants will aim to produce high-quality generated deepfakes that are as realistic as possible, while still adhering to strict constraints. The task is a few-shot problem, with one video per identity as reference.

For the Images part, these constraints include a quality check, identity similarity requirements and the preservation of key features (specific facial landmarks in images).

For the Audio part, the constraints include a quality check, identity similarity requirements and a text prompt that must be spoken in the audio sequence.

The figure below presents an overview on the Generation task.

The generated data will be uploaded on our platform and will be evaluated using a range of state-of-the-art deepfake detection systems implemented by the organizers, as well as using the other participant's deepfake detection systems from Subtask 2. The best results should be as realistic as possible, adhere to the constraints and should not be detected by deepfake detection systems.

Subtask 2: Deepfake Detection (audio and images)

In this subtask, participants will be asked to assess the authenticity of images or audio files and make a binary classification: deepfake or real. The subtask aims to evaluate the strength of deepfake detectors and also their weaknesses.

The test dataset will be composed of deepfakes generated by the task organizers, deepfakes obtained from different sopurces on the internet and the deepfakes generated by the other participants in Subtask 1.

Data

Both sub-tasks are implemented for two separate modalities: audio and images.

For the Generation subtask, the participants will receive two separate datasets, for images and audio. Both datasets contain development data that will be used for the deepfake generation process.
For the Images subtask, the participants will receive a dataset composed of over 300 video clips of length between 8 and 30 seconds, depicting a single person speaking. These videos will be used as a baseline for generating deepfakes, one video per identity. The participants will also receive between 3 and 5 sets of facial landmarks coordinates for each identity. Those will be used as a constraint for image generation.
For the Audio subtask, the participants will receive a dataset of hundreds of mono audio files of different people saying different phrases, alongs with a text transcription of those phrases. The audio files will be used as a baseline for generating deepfakes, one audio file per identity. The perticipants will also receive text prompts for each identity. Those will be used as a constraint for audio generation.

For the Detection subtask, the participants will receive a dataset composed of real and deepfake data to be classified. The dataset is composed or real images/audio files of short length and deepfakes: (1) deepfakes generated by the organizers as a baseline, using state of the art methods and popular approaches, (2) deepfakes found on the internet and (3) deepfakes generated by all participants in the Generation task.

Note: Neither of the tasks will provide a Training Dataset.

The Generation task is a few-shot generation task, while the Detection task will not provide training data to make sure that model generalization is achieved (in deepfake detection, a lot of detectors suffer from the lack of generalization, due to the models learning the Generator's fingerprint instead of more general widely applicable features). For both tasks, the participents are free to use any State-of-the-art dataset available online to enhance their model's performance. Some of our recommendations include:

Evaluation Methodology

For the Generation subtask, the generated deepfakes will be scored using a combination of the following: (1) Identity similarity score (measuring how well the generated image/audio file mimics the identity of the target person), (2) Image quality score (measuring the realism of the generated image/audio file), (3) Constraints Score (how well the deepfakes satisy the imposed constraints (text promp for audio and facial landmarks position for images) and (4) Deepfake detection Score (how well the data evaded the implemented deepfake detectors), which will be split into 2: (4a) Organizer Models Detection Score and (4b) Participant Models Detection Score (from the Detection Subtask).

For the Detection subtask, the deepfake detectors will be evaluated using metrics like accuracy, recall, precision and F1 Score. The detectors will be evaluated on a test dataset composed of Real and Deepfake Images provided by the organizers, as well as on the Deepfakes generated by other teams in the Generation Subtask.

Participant registration

Please refer to the general ImageCLEF registration instructions.

Results

Results - Generation, Audio

Participant Overall Quality Evasion
Team Go-To-Germany 0.4304 0.7190 0.5985
Team Brihadaranyaka 0.3461 0.7159 0.4834
Team Chaboom 0.3378 0.7150 0.4725
leehyunwoo* 0.2695 0.5980 0.4507
ryu-tae-ung* 0.2594 0.6528 0.3974
Team Deepfake1 0.2224 0.6738 0.3301
gwangseop_lee*, leehowoo*, kim_minseo* 0.2151 0.6793 0.3166
k20221289 0.2047 0.6635 0.3086
Team Twinkle 0.1951 0.6969 0.2800
Team CS Morgan Lab 0.1806 0.4931 0.3662

* Participants marked with an asterisk did not submit a corresponding working notes paper.

Results - Detection, Audio

Participant Score Org. DF Org. Real Org. Real GT Part. DF Part. DF (W)
Team Go-To-Germany 0.9522 0.9719 1.0000 0.8875 1.0000 1.0000
Team Deepfake1 0.8814 0.8307 0.9521 0.8917 0.8712 0.8661
Team Chaboom 0.7564 0.5411 0.8750 0.8438 0.6950 0.6932
gwangseop_lee* 0.7267 0.3698 0.9500 0.9625 0.5295 0.5243
Team Twinkle 0.7017 0.2427 1.0000 0.9979 0.4343 0.4457
leehowoo* 0.6801 0.3646 0.7958 0.8542 0.5579 0.5559
Team CS Morgan Lab 0.5918 0.1646 0.9896 0.9938 0.2008 0.1972
ryu-tae-ung* 0.5769 0.1057 1.0000 1.0000 0.1607 0.1658
botter 0.5595 0.4182 0.5396 0.6271 0.5377 0.5323
cc_rmws 0.5551 0.2979 0.8146 0.8625 0.2407 0.2472
k20221289 0.5292 0.1459 0.9333 0.8854 0.1707 0.1678
haripriya, petchiammal 0.5253 0.8349 0.1833 0.1437 0.9186 0.9151
Team Brihadaranyaka 0.5092 0.3594 0.5813 0.6083 0.4336 0.4295
minbro_01* 0.4883 0.5110 0.6208 0.5917 0.3425 0.3461
kim_minseo* 0.4405 0.1953 0.6396 0.6229 0.2691 0.2697

* Participants marked with an asterisk did not submit a corresponding working notes paper.

Results - Generation, Images

Participant Overall Quality Evasion Evasion Part. Evasion Org. Landmark Distance Identity Similarity
Team Brihadaranyaka 0.4364 0.7056 0.6185 0.5603 0.7541 0.0154 0.6239
Team Go-To-Germany 0.4170 0.6188 0.6739 0.5762 0.9019 0.0065 0.5366
Team Chaboom 0.2486 0.3823 0.6503 0.5657 0.8478 0.0076 0.1749
ryu-tae-ung* 0.2298 0.4672 0.4918 0.3885 0.7330 0.1771 0.6803
gwangseop_lee*, kim_minseo*, leehowoo* 0.2264 0.4620 0.4902 0.3822 0.7420 0.1197 0.6575
Team Deepfake1 0.1541 0.4000 0.3854 0.3574 0.4505 0.0074 0.4097
Team Twinkle 0.1471 0.2552 0.5767 0.5269 0.6927 0.1305 0.5458
k20221289 0.1225 0.3705 0.3306 0.3185 0.3589 0.0092 0.3100
Team MarsadLab 0.0967 0.5631 0.1717 0.0000 0.5722 0.0093 0.5160
Team CS Morgan Lab 0.0000 0.0000 0.4167 0.3350 0.6073 0.3802 0.0000
leehyunwoo* 0.0000 0.0000 0.3018 0.2373 0.4523 0.2580 0.0000

* Participants marked with an asterisk did not submit a corresponding working notes paper.

Results - Detection, Images

Participant Score Org. DF Org. Real Org. Real GT Part. DF Part. DF (W)
minbro_01* 0.7103 0.7995 0.6047 0.6607 0.7933 0.7641
Team Go-To-Germany 0.6987 0.9939 0.4324 0.5729 0.8822 0.8171
k20221289 0.6936 0.6660 0.9056 0.7335 0.6774 0.6077
isurukalhara* 0.6297 0.1488 0.9409 0.9541 0.4611 0.3477
Team Deepfake1 0.6253 0.6919 0.8426 0.9102 0.3535 0.2694
botter 0.6038 0.7928 0.6241 0.4301 0.7476 0.7252
nataliemorad* 0.5964 0.6284 0.7129 0.6557 0.6217 0.5000
cc_rmws 0.5858 0.5266 0.6491 0.5948 0.6363 0.5758
phantom 0.5772 0.5710 0.3426 0.3204 0.9009 0.8942
Team MarsadLab 0.5766 0.7382 0.6026 0.5040 0.6540 0.6022
cyril_xu 0.5648 0.3858 0.8103 0.7735 0.4546 0.3396
jayasree 0.5562 0.6454 0.5309 0.6287 0.5557 0.4677
haripriya, petchiammal 0.5448 0.3179 0.8129 0.8353 0.2778 0.2439
ryu-tae-ung* 0.5402 0.6859 0.4203 0.3473 0.6905 0.7267
leehowoo* 0.5362 0.5343 0.4756 0.5609 0.5883 0.5271
Team Brihadaranyaka 0.5358 0.5580 0.5388 0.6896 0.4208 0.3756
Team CS Morgan Lab 0.5197 0.0950 0.8371 0.9641 0.1576 0.1021
Team Twinkle 0.5096 0.7587 0.3897 0.2265 0.7028 0.7604
gwangseop_lee* 0.5092 0.8968 0.1012 0.1727 0.8404 0.8509
kim_minseo* 0.5087 0.8973 0.0997 0.1717 0.8404 0.8507
mohamedbasem* 0.5052 0.0244 0.9988 1.0000 0.0574 0.0072
Team Chaboom 0.5022 0.8351 0.1826 0.2874 0.7098 0.7136

* Participants marked with an asterisk did not submit a corresponding working notes paper.

CEUR Working Notes

Paper Submission Instructions

The full schedule is available at:
https://clef2026.clef-initiative.eu/dates/

Important Dates

  • End of evaluation cycle (submission of runs): 7 May 2026
  • Submission of participant papers (CEUR-WS): 28 May 2026
  • Notification of acceptance for participant papers (CEUR-WS): 30 June 2026
  • Camera-ready submission of participant papers: 6 July 2026

All submissions, reviews, and camera-ready versions will be handled through EasyChair: EasyChair CLEF 2026
A separate EasyChair track will be created for each lab/workshop. Please make sure you submit in the correct track.
The papers will go through a review process and will receive a decision from the lab organizers.

The participant papers should be written using the template provided here:
CLEF 2026 Working Notes Submission Template

Submissions are expected to be in English language and 5 pages minimum, with no maximum page limit.

Citations

When referring to ImageCLEF 2026, please cite the following:

@inproceedings{ImageCLEF2026,
title = {Overview of ImageCLEF 2026: Multimodal Challenges in Medicine, Science, Agritech, and Security},
author = {Bogdan Ionescu and Henning M{\"u}ller and Dan{-}Cristian Stanciu and Andrei Radu and Radu{-}George Bolborici and Marian Negru and Alexandru{-}Florin Ene and Vlad{-}Mihai Vasilescu and Ana-Antonia Nicolae and Liviu{-}Daniel \c{S}tefan and Mihai{-}Gabriel Constantin and Mihai Dogariu and Alexandra{-}Georgiana Andrei and Hendrik Damm and Tabea M. G. Pakull and Asma {Ben Abacha} and Alba {Garc\'ia Seco de Herrera} and Christoph M. Friedrich and Raphael Br{\"u}ngel and Lea Reinartz and Henning Sch{\"a}fer and Cynthia Sabrina Schmidt and Benjamin Bracke and Praveen Nath and Bahad{\i}r Ery{\i}lmaz and Maja Hjuler and Diandra Fabre and Claire Lemaire and Benjamin Lecouteux and Didier Schwab and Dimitar Dimitrov and Ming Shan Hee and Momina Ahsan and Sarfraz Ahmad and Dimitrina Zlatkova and Georgi Pachov and Zhuohan Xie and Preslav Nakov and Ivan Koychev and Juampablo E. {Heras Rivera} and Daniel K. Low and Wen{-}wai Yim and Jacob Ruzevick and Dan Child and Mehmet Kurt and Zhaoyi Sun and Fei Xia and Meliha Yetisgen and Ahmedkhan Radzhabov and Yuri Prokopchuk and Vassili Kovalev and Dzmitry Karpenka and Steven A. Hicks and Sushant Gautam and Michael A. Riegler and Vajira Thambawita and P\r{a}l Halvorsen and Mohammad {El Sakka} and Josiane Mothe and Alexandra B\u{a}icoianu and Corneliu{-}Nicolae Florea and Mihai Ivanovici},
booktitle = {Experimental IR Meets Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction},
series = {Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference of the CLEF Association (CLEF 2026)},
year = {2026},
month = {September 21--24},
address = {Jena, Germany},
publisher = {Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science LNCS},
}

When referring to the ImageCLEF 2026 Deepfake Task , please cite the following:

@inproceedings{ImageCLEFDeepfakeTaskOverview2026,
title = {Overview of ImageCLEF 2026 Deepfake Task: Multimodal Detection and Generation of Deepfakes},
author = {Dan{-}Cristian Stanciu and Andrei Radu and Radu{-}George Bolborici and Marian Negru and Alexandru{-}Florin Ene and Vlad{-}Mihai Vasilescu and Ana-Antonia Nicolae and Bogdan Ionescu and Liviu{-}Daniel \c{S}tefan and Mihai{-}Gabriel Constantin and Mihai Dogariu and Alexandra{-}Georgiana Andrei},
booktitle = {CLEF 2026 Working Notes},
series = {CEUR Workshop Proceedings},
year = {2026},
month = {September 21--24},
address = {Jena, Germany},
publisher = {CEUR-WS.org},
}

Contact

Contact person: Dan-Cristian Stanciu - dan.stanciu1203@upb.ro

Organizers

Image Generation and Detection

Dan-Cristian Stanciu, National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest
Bogdan Ionescu, National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest
Liviu-Daniel Ștefan, National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest
Mihai-Gabriel Constantin, National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest
Mihai Dogariu, National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest
Alexandra Andrei, National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest, Romania

Audio Generation and Detection

Ana Nicolae, National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest
Andrei-Radu Danila, National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest
Radu-George Bolborici, National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest
Marian Negru, National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest
Alexandru-Florin Ene, National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest
Ana-Antonia Nicolae, National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest
Vlad-Mihai Vasilescu, National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest

AttachmentSize
Image icon POZA_deepfake1_bun.png437.33 KB